🔗 Share this article

Prosecutors informed the tribunal that law enforcement had valid concerns that Stephen Yaxley-Lennon's mobile contained material relevant to acts of terrorism when they detained him last year as he attempted to depart from the UK.

Refusal to Provide Phone Pin

The right-wing campaigner, using his real name is Tommy Robinson, allegedly declined to provide his phone pin to officers, stating it contained “journalistic material.” This occurred after he was intercepted at the Channel tunnel on July 28, 2024.

Trial Claims on Anti-Terror Authority

On the final day of the trial, prosecutor the prosecution stated that the anti-terror authorities used by law enforcement are designed to allow intelligence gathering. She claimed that officers had reasonable suspicion to think Robinson continued to have connections to far-right activists, even after the dissolution of the English Defence League (EDL).

While his affiliation of the EDL has come to an end, his views have not gone away. He is recognized for having those opinions and therefore it is a reasonable suspicion to think that on his phone there could be information pertaining to terrorist acts,” she told Westminster magistrates court.

Morris added, His opinions – to which he is entitled – were not the focus for their concern on July 28. It was his connection to others who are possibly involved in prohibited activities.”

Circumstances of the Detention

The campaigner had arrived alone at the Eurotunnel in a luxury vehicle owned by a acquaintance and was traveling to the Spanish resort of the Spanish coast with over £13,000 in a small bag, the trial heard.

The funds was said to have been from a collection to offset expenses from organizing a large demonstration that occurred the previous day in Trafalgar Square.

Defense Submissions

Robinson, who disputes failing to comply with counter-terrorism powers during the encounter on 28 July of the previous year, faces up to three months in prison or a possible £2,500 fine if convicted.

His lawyer, defense counsel, argued in final arguments that anti-terror officers who detained Robinson had engaged in a “fishing expedition” and that he had been unlawfully detained.

Referring to testimony from officers who stated they contacted other organizations” after arresting Robinson, Williamson claimed this was a allusion to the intelligence agencies and that no evidence had been offered from the security service to suggest his client was a security threat.

Williamson said the police action was biased” because it was based to a large extent on a protected characteristic.” He said that the “predominant influence” on the decision to stop him was recognizing his identity”.

He added that officers had used an special authority that needs to be properly policed” to try to find out information that was previously available. The barrister proposed that Robinson traveled to the resort regularly, which ought to have reduced the officers’ suspicions about him.

Expenses and Judgment Timing

Robinson claimed that his court expenses in the case were being paid for by the tech billionaire, the proprietor of X and Tesla, who has appeared as an supporter of the far-right activist and recently spoke at a gathering arranged by him in London via a livestream.

A suggested date of next Tuesday for the verdict was altered by the district judge, Sam Goozee, after Williamson said Robinson was due to be a guest of the Israeli government from the midweek and would not come back until October 25.

{“I wouldn’t trouble you if this was a trip to Benidorm. I would ask him to rearrange it but he is a guest of a foreign government,” stated Williamson.

Goozee announced he would deliver his ruling on the start of 4 November.