🔗 Share this article

In a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that prevented Australian-based users from seeing video footage of the violent event involving influencer Charlie Kirk. The appeal was initiated by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an order sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

After the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in September, the regulator applied to the classification board to assess and rate the circulating video. It first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that allowed the regulator to order platforms to restrict access to the posts for an Australian audience.

Elon Musk's company filed an appeal for a pair of videos related to the Kirk incident. It also appealed a comparable ban on another piece of footage—showing the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

Arguing its case, X contended that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

X maintained the footage was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that generated widespread discussion". X even compared the footage and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the classification panel concluded that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary might have met that threshold. Consequently, the panel revised the rating of the videos to R18+.

A Dissenting Viewpoint

A minority on the board held a contrary view, arguing the post was "content designed for sharing for the likely purposes of amusement and/or personal gain (such as likes, shares, or views)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was released years after the assassination, "once emotions around the matter had subsided".

Response Following the Decision

In a statement on its global government affairs account, X welcomed the ruling.

"X fought this case to defend free speech and the importance of access to information about matters of public significance. We remain committed to protecting these principles."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator acknowledged the board's decision, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material being displayed to Australians who are minors".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

Separately, the regulator did not issue formal notices to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident circulating on social media. Officials commented that while the images were upsetting, they had not met the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to use sensitive content labels and screens, such as blurring, on such content in line with their own content policies.